Abstract
This study compares decision processes of consensus and devil's advocacy within an additivetask, a disjunctive task, and a conjunctive task structure. The results suggest that high-conflictdecision processes such as devil's advocacy enhances decision making in disjunctive tasks,retards decision making in additive tasks, but has no effect on decision making in conjunctivetasks. Perceptions of the group's atmosphere were most positive within consensus groups.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
