Consensus research priorities for facial palsy: A Delphi survey of patients, carers, clinicians and researchers

Abstract

Despite the potential negative impact of facial palsy, major gaps in understanding persist surrounding the treatment and care of those affected. This collaborative three-round Delphi process aimed to identify priorities for future facial palsy research, from the perspective of clinicians, researchers, patients and carers. It also determined whether the research priorities of patients and carers aligned with those of health professionals and researchers. In Round 1, participants (n = 85) were asked to generate research questions by focus groups or an online or postal survey. In Rounds 2 (n = 72) and 3 (n = 78), participants were asked to rate the priorities identified on a 5-point ordinal scale. Thirty-six questions reached the definition of 'high priority' consensus. Seven of each groups' top ten research priorities were shared. Prioritised questions included the provision and pathways of care, the psychosocial impact of living with facial palsy and the effective management of side effects. Establishing the research priorities in the field of facial palsy is a significant first step in ensuring that the future research agenda is focussed on topics that are considered important by both patients and health professionals.