Abstract
Our research used pictures of four different landscapes to study the effects of two possible sources (visual aesthetic quality (VAQ) and landscape types) on the consensus of visual preferences among 156 undergraduate respondents. There were ten pictures each of urban, urban green space, farm, and forest landscapes presented for visual preference assessment. We found that VAQ assessment had a significantly positive linear relationship with judgment consensus when the four landscape types were combined. However, this relationship differed when examining one individual landscape type, it varied depending on the different landscape types. Thus landscape types had a significant influence on the consensus. Additionally, we found that consensus increased when a landscape was well maintained and had greater vegetation coverage.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
