Abstract
ABSTRACT As the debate about the automaticity of attentional capture has raged on over the years, knowledge of how selection functions has been accumulating in the literature. Luck et al. (2021) highlights emerging areas of consensus, including support for multiple mechanisms that influence attentional guidance. Here, I revisit the biased competition model of [Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18(1), 193–222. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205] to bring additional perspective. This aims to provide insight about open questions of “control” and to offer guidance in how to address other conceptual issues that hinder progress toward a better understanding of attentional functioning.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
