Consecutive Case Series of Melanoma Sentinel Node Biopsy for Lymphoseek Compared to Sulfur Colloids

Abstract

BackgroundSentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an important adjunct in the staging of patients with melanoma. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy with radiolabeled isotopes is essential to localize sentinel nodes for removal. Our study compared the effectiveness of Lymphoseek to standard sulfur colloids in patients with melanoma undergoing SLNB. MethodsWe queried our IRB-approved melanoma database to identify 370 consecutive patients who underwent SLNB from 2012 to 2016 with at least 1 y of follow-up. There were 185 patients in each group. Data points included characteristics of the primary melanoma lymphoscintigraphy and SLNB. Student's t-test and chi-square were used to analyze the data with a P value of <0.05 being considered significant. ResultsPatients were equally matched in regard to age, sex, and primary characteristics of their melanoma. In comparison to sulfur colloid, Lymphoseek required lower radiation dosages (P < 0.001), shorter mapping times (P = 0.008), and decreased number of sentinel nodes removed (P = 0.03). There was no difference in the number of patients with positive nodes (P = 0.5). In addition, there were no statistical differences between the two radioactive tracers in regard to the number of patients with false-negative SLNB. ConclusionLymphoseek has the potential to decrease radioactivity and mapping time in patients who need SLNB. With a decrease in the number of nodes removed without loss of sensitivity, there is a potential to avoid unnecessary node removal and thus complications such as lymphedema. Longer follow-up will help to determine if there is any increase in false-negative rates despite fewer nodes removed.