Abstract
Flexible bronchoscopy (FB) is a cornerstone of modern pulmonary medicine. However, considerable heterogeneity persists with respect to education, training, and the performance of sedation during FB. Sedation administered by a non-anesthesiologist during FB has been demonstrated to be safe and effective, although comorbidities and respiratory disease severity must be taken into account regarding choice of sedation and monitoring. There is undoubtedly room for improvement concerning basic education and training in this field. In addition, current study heterogeneity complicates comparisons between various sedation regimens which in turn limit state of the art recommendations. To reach a broad acceptance of non-anesthesiologist administered sedation, future studies and guidelines must increasingly focus on education and training. Research should be performed to establish a concept of harmonized patient selection for different sedation practices.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.