Abstract
The water industry needs to develop concentration standards that will enable it to assess the accuracy of particle counts taken by different instruments.Research was undertaken to test whether different particle counters yield the same particle count and size distribution information, to assess the possibility of using particle concentration standards from other applications in the water industry, and to develop and test a concentration standard for use in the water industry. Five particle counters were used, including duplicates of each of two manufacturers' light‐obscuration instruments (commonly used in the water industry) and one electrical sensing zone (ESZ) instrument. On all types of samples (latex spheres, a commercially available fine test dust used as a standard in other industries, and water treatment plant samples), the light‐obscuration instruments consistently measured far fewer particles in the smallest sizes (2–5 μm) than the ESZ instrument, and evidence is presented that suggests the ESZ instrument is more correct. Recommendations for standards to use with light‐obscuration instruments include using a multimodal count standard using latex spheres of two sizes, with those sizes being in the middle of standardized size ranges; using separate sizing standards at the boundaries of the size ranges; and avoiding any use of particle counters for regulatory purposes at this time.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
