Abstract

This article considers whether public servants should be exempt from South Africa’s equality provisions and anti-discrimination legislation in solemnizing same-sex marriages. In order to deal with this question, the article analyses the treatment of freedom of conscience and conscientious objection by comparing the solemnization of same-sex marriage by public servants, with another public service: that of terminations of pregnancy. While each situation will inevitably turn on the particular circumstances of the case, I argue that there should be a content-neutral guiding principle (as well as consistency) in dealing with these situations. The issue in each situation is narrowed to whether a civil servant’s personal convictions can override the state’s secular obligations in providing a service, and whether there is room for a qualified right to conscientious objection. By analysing the matter in this way, it is clear that the unqualified statutory exemption clause in South Africa’s Civil Union Act is constitutionally objectionable.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call