Abstract

Does colonialism have long-term effects on political stability? We address this question through a study of India’s Naxalite insurgency, a Maoist rebellion that has been characterized by its left-wing proponents as having roots in the colonial period. We highlight three mechanisms linking colonialism with contemporary Naxalite violence–land inequality, discriminatory policies toward low-caste and tribal groups, and upper-caste dominated administrative institutions. We then analyze how the degree of British influence relates to Naxalite conflict in 589 districts from 1980-2011. We find a positive association between British influence and the strength of the Naxalite rebellion across all of India, within the “Red Corridor” region itself, and within former princely states. Our results are robust to a coarsened exact matching analysis and a wide array of robustness checks. The findings call into question whether the supposedly beneficial administrative and institutional legacies of colonialism can be evaluated without reference to their social costs.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.