Abstract

The distribution of neutral genetic variation in subdivided populations is driven by the interplay between genetic drift, migration, local extinction and colonization. The influence of environmental and demographic factors has also been increasingly examined in empirical studies, but generally focusing on a single species. An open question is whether these factors will similarly, or idiosyncratically, affect a guild of species occupying the same, though exhibiting different traits, mating systems and histories. We addressed it by comparing the population genetic structure of the four most common species of hermaphroditic freshwater snails in Guadeloupe (Lesser Antilles), which occupy a network of patchily distributed sites experiencing temporal variation in water availability. We analyzed microsatellite variability in 21 to 43 populations per species, and built predictions on how several environmental and demographic variables, quantified from a long-term annual survey, as well as species traits, may affect the distribution of genetic variation. These species displayed similarities, such as fairly high levels of variation, but with marked differences among sites, as well as strong genetic differentiation and limited isolation by distance, which can be explained by passive dispersal (strong role of site connectivity), extinction/colonization dynamics and variation in local population size. They also exhibit differences, largely due to the mating system with less genetic diversity and more genetic differentiation in the two selfing species when compared to the two outcrossing ones. These differences can also be attributed to interspecific interactions resulting from the ongoing invasion of Guadeloupe by one of the species studied, which affects the demography of other species, and, to a limited extent, to local environmental factors. Our comparative approach shows both differences and uniqueness in the way species occupy the same landscape, and provides a possible entry to interspecific interactions in community assembly.

Highlights

  • The evolutionary dynamics of species occupying patchily distributed habitats has been the subject of a large body of both experimental and theoretical work (Hanski & Gaggiotti, 2004; Bell, 2008; Charlesworth & Charlesworth, 2010), highlighting the role of finite size of populations and migration, and of their spatial and temporal variation

  • We will analyze here how the spatial distribution of neutral variation in a patchy landscape is affected by the following factors: (i) environmental factors, especially local ones, (ii) traits, especially mating systems, and (iii) invasion dynamics. (i) Variation in population size, as well as extinction / colonization dynamics, may affect the strength of both genetic drift and gene flow, and genetic variation (Barton & Whitlock, 1997; Hanski & Gaggiotti, 2004)

  • Connectivity can be evaluated based on local features of accessibility, and through some form of geographic distance, possibly taking into account landscape elements modulating dispersal (Barton & Whitlock, 1997; Rousset, 1997; Balkenhol et al, 2015; Manel & Holderegger, 2013). (ii) Mating systems can vary widely among species, even closely related ones, or even within species, which affects the distribution of genetic variability, as they interact in a complex manner with both environmental factors and demography

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The evolutionary dynamics of species occupying patchily distributed habitats has been the subject of a large body of both experimental and theoretical work (Hanski & Gaggiotti, 2004; Bell, 2008; Charlesworth & Charlesworth, 2010), highlighting the role of finite size of populations and migration, and of their spatial and temporal variation. Metapopulation approaches consider population extinction and colonization, which roles depend from the origin of the propagule pool (Levins, 1969; Whitlock & Barton, 1997; Hanski & Gaggiotti, 2004) These demographic processes may occur at the scale of whole metapopulations, for example in situations of biological invasions (e.g., Davis, 2008; Facon & David, 2006), with possible variation loss at the migration front due to founder effects. Invasion is often associated with founder effect and variation loss at invasion front (Roman & Darling, 2007; Pannell, 2015), with increased frequencies of some alleles through genetic drift (Excoffier & Ray, 2008)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call