Abstract

Many children have difficulties with accurate self-monitoring and effective regulation of study, and this may cause them to miss learning opportunities. In the classroom, teachers play a key role in supporting children with metacognition and learning. The present study aimed to acquire insights into how teachers’ cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction, as well as teacher-directed and child-centered instructional practices are related to children’s self-monitoring accuracy, regulation of study, and learning performance. Twenty-one teachers and 308 children (2nd and 4th grade elementary school) participated. Teachers instructed a secret code task, children had to learn the match between letters of the alphabet and corresponding symbols. Teachers were observed and audio-recordings were made of their instructions. Then, children were asked to (a) make restudy selections, (b) complete a test, and (c) self-monitor test performance. Although teachers both addressed cognitive and metacognitive strategies, they more often instructed children about cognitive strategies. Further, teaching practices were more often teacher-directed than child-centered. Although there were no relations between teachers’ instructions for metacognitive strategies and children’s outcome measures, teaching cognitive strategies was positively associated with children’s performance and self-monitoring accuracy. However, teaching cognitive strategies did not predict effective restudy selections. Rather, child-centered instructions (i.e., giving children autonomy to regulate their own learning) positively predicted children’s restudy, and further, children’s self-monitoring was more accurate in classrooms where teachers more often used child-centered instructional practices. This seems to imply that not only the content of the instructions itself, but particularly the way these are given, affects children’s metacognition.

Highlights

  • Many children have difficulties with accurate self-monitoring and effective regulation of study, and this may cause them to miss learning opportunities

  • We describe findings on children’s performance and metacognition

  • Effects of teaching cognitive and metacognitive strategies With use of linear mixed model analyses, we investigated whether cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction, as measured on the teacher level, predicted performance and metacognition on the child level

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many children have difficulties with accurate self-monitoring and effective regulation of study, and this may cause them to miss learning opportunities. The present study aimed to acquire insights into how teachers’ cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction, as well as teacher-directed and child-centered instructional practices are related to children’s self-monitoring accuracy, regulation of study, and learning performance. Child-centered instructions (i.e., giving children autonomy to regulate their own learning) positively predicted children’s restudy, and further, children’s self-monitoring was more accurate in classrooms where teachers more often used childcentered instructional practices. This seems to imply that the content of the instructions itself, but the way these are given, affects children’s metacognition. The present study aimed to acquire insight into how teacher instructions may support children’s metacognitive accuracy (as indicated by self-monitoring and restudy selections) and learning performance. Teachers’ instructions about cognitive and metacognitive strategies are related to children’s learning across the course of elementary school and beyond (De Boer et al 2018; Donker et al 2014; Grammer et al 2013; Ornstein et al 2010)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call