Abstract
Acts of Congress often contain provisions that are ambiguous, complex and/or contradictory, and it is often left to the courts to discern the meaning of the language. This paper examines the potential influence of one method of inter‐branch communication—an amicus curiae brief filed by members of Congress in Supreme Court cases. Several characteristics of the briefs filed by members of Congress during the 1990s are coded and it is found that unlike the solicitor general, members of Congress have little impact on the decisions of the High Court. There is communication between members of Congress and the Court. Thus, this investigation provides no support for the rational actor model of judicial decision‐making; however, the communication seems to serve the re‐election goals of legislators.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
