Abstract

Congress and Harry S. Truman: A Conflicted Legacy. Edited by Donald A. Ritchie. Kirksville, MO: State University Press, 2011. 209 pp. The subtitle of this collection of essays is certainly appropriate. Participants at the Seventh Legacy Symposium, Truman and Congress: A Conflicted Legacy, offered wide array of opinions Harry S. Truman's relationship with Congress, as his administration tackled the weighty affairs of state. The resulting book includes three contributions focusing legislative-executive relations, three domestic affairs, and three foreign policy matters, as well as fascinating Graphic Essay with images of key documents, White House staff members, powerful members of Congress, and the president at work. So, how did contributors to this volume interpret Truman's record of accomplishments? To set the stage, Donald A. Ritchie, historian of the U.S. Senate, stressed the circumstances that the new president confronted when he assumed the office: difficult time politically, with the gas tank of liberal reformism on empty and citizens eager to get with their lives (p. xviii). Truman's tenure unfolded, in Alonzo L. Hamby's words, during a postwar age of conservative restoration (p. 93). Nevertheless, gutsy president accomplished great deal. Central to Truman's record was more systematic approach to relations with the legislative branch. In his sweeping introductory survey of White House-Congress relations after Franklin D. Roosevelt, Ritchie emphasized the significance of the administration's pioneering liaison efforts with Congress. was transitional figure whose dealings with Congress, Ritchie reminds readers, was halfway between the 'designed chaos' of his predecessor and the 'structural purity' of his successor (p. xxi). It must be noted, however, that Ken Hechler, White House staff member from 1949 to 1953, believes that interpretation an exaggeration, and recalled senior administrative assistant George Elsey's description of liaison staffers as glorified errand boys for the White House appointments secretary (pp. 4-5). In the policy realm, the embattled president articulated broad liberal vision for the postwar years and what Hamby concluded was a largely unattainable checklist of legislation (p. 99). Ritchie, Hamby, Susan M. Hartmann, Richard S. Conley, and other contributors to this volume recognized the deep schism that occurred between foreign and domestic policy. Bipartisanship in foreign policy, the focus of Hartmann's assessment of the early Cold War years, led to the enactment of far-reaching containment program. …

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.