Abstract

Managerial theories of conglomerate mergers suggest that such mergers are motivated by the manager's desire to reduce his firm's—and thus his income—risk. Yet, the application of optimal contracting models [e.g., Diamond and Verrecchia (1982)] to this issue suggests that the stockholders, who bear the cost of uncertainty, may also benefit from reducing the firm's risk. Examining the market reaction to congomerate mergers announcements, we cannot support the hypothesis that managers initiate conglomerate mergers solely for their own benefit to the detriment of stockholders.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.