Abstract
We analyze the words that rms use to describe their products to examine in which industries rms operate. We nd strong support for the proposition that when asset complementarities across product markets are strong as measured by industry product language overlaps, rms are more likely to operate across industries. More generally, multiple-industry rms avoid industries with more distinct language boundaries, as measured using language transitivity from rival to rival. Multiple-industry rms are also less likely to operate in industries with high within-industry word similarity and high economies of scale. These ndings are consistent with rms choosing organizational form based on product market characteristics and asset complementarities.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.