Abstract
SUMMARY Two cases of prostatic urethral polyps are reported. These along with the 28 previously reported cases are analysed from a clinical and pathological standpoint. I t is concluded that this is a non-neoplastic congenital defect. Because of its obstructive qualities it is of clinical significance and should be recognised as a separate entity. To eliminate further discrepancies in nomenclature it is suggested that this lesion be identified with the title “congenital polyp of the prostatic urethra.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
