Abstract

Maintaining patient identity throughout the biopsy pathway is critical for the practice of dermatology and dermatopathology. From the biopsy procedure to the acquisition of the pathology report, a specimen may pass through the hands of more than twenty individuals in several workplaces. The risk of a mix-up is considerable and may account for more serious mistakes than diagnostic errors. To prevent specimen mix-up, work processes should be standardized and automated wherever possible, e.g., by strict order in the operating room and in the laboratory and by adoption of a bar code system to identify specimens and corresponding request forms. Mutual control of clinicians, technicians, histopathologists, and secretaries, both simultaneously and downstream, is essential to detect errors. The most vulnerable steps of the biopsy pathway, namely, labeling of specimens and request forms and accessioning of biopsy specimens in the laboratory, should be carried out by two persons simultaneously. In preceding work steps, clues must be provided that allow a mix-up to be detected later on, such as information about clinical diagnosis, biopsy technique, and biopsy site by the clinician, and a sketch of the specimen by the technician grossing it. Awareness of the danger of specimen mix-up is essential for preventing and detecting it. The awareness can be heightened by documentation of any error in the biopsy pathway. In case of suspicion, a mix-up of specimens from different patients can be confirmed by DNA analysis.

Highlights

  • Methods of quality controlIn tests of blood or urine, mix-up of specimens can be recognized in follow-up examinations if one result is not compatible with all the others

  • Every year, hundreds of thousands of pages are devoted to diagnostic problems in medicine

  • Maintaining patient identity throughout the biopsy pathway is critical for the practice of dermatology and dermatopathology

Read more

Summary

Methods of quality control

In tests of blood or urine, mix-up of specimens can be recognized in follow-up examinations if one result is not compatible with all the others. The best way to prevent and detect the mix-up of specimens seems to be good organization of all steps connected with a biopsy, from the surgical procedure itself to labeling of sample bottles and request forms in the operating room, accessioning of specimens in the laboratory, procession of specimens, assessment of histopathologic findings at the microscope, typing of dictations, transmission of reports, and, assignment of reports to the respective patients in the medical practice or clinic. The size and shape of biopsy specimens should be documented in the laboratory before dissecting specimens in order to fit them into tissue cassettes If this is done, a subsequent mix-up can be detected by comparing those data with the histopathologic section on the slide. If such misinformation is provided repeatedly by a particular medical practice or clinic, the histopathologist will eventually seize to inquire about discrepancies between clinical and histopathologic diagnoses, Source of error

Missing or incorrect Laboratory
Incorrect corre- Practice: Several bottles with specimens Histopathologist
Transfer of
Confusion of slides Laboratory
Slip of the tongue when dictating a computer code
Findings
Entry of a wrong computer code
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call