Abstract
During a five-year period the authors taught over 100 students in a graduate course (The Nature of Science) counting toward teacher certification at the Harvard Graduate School of Education. Despite the fact that students had undergraduate degrees in the sciences, most of them found the application of models in science challenging and the epistemological consequences unsettling. Moreover, students found it especially difficult to use a model to correctly generate predictions, which was starkly illustrated with the application of Archimedes’ principle during our unit on floating and sinking. We examine the deceptive belief that student success with algorithms and word problems leads to conceptual understanding as well as the conceptual change necessary to understand the relationship between evidence and inference as explored in the nature of science course. Considering the apparently strong science backgrounds of our students, we doubt that typical pre-college students can achieve the goals described in the National Science Education Standards in the short time typically allotted for their science studies. We explore the issues students face in “understanding” science as well as the impact of science education on students and teachers, and implications for policy makers and pre-service programs.
Highlights
Over the course of five years the authors taught a one-semester course entitled, “The Nature of Science” to over a hundred students at the Harvard Graduate School of Education
We examine the deceptive belief that student success with algorithms and word problems leads to conceptual understanding as well as the conceptual change necessary to understand the relationship between evidence and inference as explored in the nature of science course
Considering the apparently strong science backgrounds of our students, we doubt that typical pre-college students can achieve the goals described in the National Science Education Standards in the short time typically allotted for their science studies
Summary
Over the course of five years the authors taught a one-semester course entitled, “The Nature of Science” to over a hundred students at the Harvard Graduate School of Education. In response to these two observations, our goal was to overcome student difficulties by emphasizing (1) the distinction between evidence and inference, and (2) the importance of models in science. Both goals fall within a broader topic, the nature of science (“NOS” hereafter), which has been the central focus of science education since the beginning of the 20th century (Abd-El-Khalick & Lederman, 2000).
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
