Abstract

In a recent paper, here referred to as part I, we considered the celestial four-gluon amplitude with one gluon represented by the shadow transform of the corresponding primary field operator. This correlator is ill-defined because it contains branch points related to the presence of conformal blocks with complex spin. In this work, we adopt a procedure similar to minimal models and construct a single-valued completion of the shadow correlator, in the limit when the shadow is “soft.” By following the approach of Dotsenko and Fateev, we obtain an integral representation of such a single-valued correlator. This allows inverting the shadow transform and constructing a single-valued celestial four-gluon amplitude. This amplitude is drastically different from the original Mellin amplitude. It is defined over the entire complex plane and has correct crossing symmetry, OPE and bootstrap properties. It agrees with all known OPEs of celestial gluon operators. The conformal block spectrum consists of primary fields with dimensions ∆ = m + iλ, with integer m ≥ 1 and various, but always integer spin, in all group representations contained in the product of two adjoint representations.

Highlights

  • When viewed as CFT correlators, celestial amplitudes exhibit some unusual properties

  • We closed the loop and returned to where we started in part I — to the four-gluon celestial amplitude

  • Defined as the Mellin transform of standard scattering amplitude, it is ill-defined as a CFT correlator because the positions of primary field operators are constrained by four-dimensional kinematics

Read more

Summary

Single-valued completion in the soft shadow limit

The conformal correlators discussed in part I were obtained from the celestial four-gluon amplitude [2] in MHV helicity configuration (−, −, +, +), with gauge indices (a1, a2, a3, a4). It is remarkable that a single-valued correlation function can be constructed by adding just one term for each group factor. Is it a unique completion of the original correlator? The uniqueness follows from the condition that a Verma module degenerates at level 2, which is equivalent to a second order differential equation admitting only two linearly independent solutions [19] In our case, it is not clear what is the origin of such a condition, but the antiholomorphic functions I1(x) and I2(x) are two solutions of a similar equation.

Conformal block decomposition
Channel decomposition of SU(2) group factors
Crossing symmetry and OPE
OPE at the leading order
Examples of non-leading OPE terms
Integral representations of the single-valued correlator
Complex integrals in Dotsenko-Fateev form
Complex integrals as single-valued projections
Single-valued celestial amplitudes from inverted shadows
Summary and conclusions
B The single-valued projection
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call