Abstract

Objective: This confocal microscopy study evaluated the cement/dentin and cement/post interfaces along the root canal walls when fiber glass posts were bonded to dentin using different types of cements.Material and methods: Thirty endodontically treated premolars were divided into 3 groups according to the adhesive materials used in the bonding procedure: Prime & Bond 2.1/Self Cure + Enforce, RelyX Unicem and RelyX Luting. Rhodamine B dye was incorporated in the luting materials for the cementation of the fiber glass posts (Exacto, Angelus) to dentin. Three transversal slices (apical, middle and coronal) were examined under confocal laser scanning microscopy. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kappa, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunnet tests.Results: The Prime & Bond 2.1/Self Cure + Enforce presented a uniform formation of tags in the dentin but gaps in the cement/dentin interface. The RelyX Unicem and RelyX Luting presented an adhesive interface with a fewer amount of gaps, but showed shorter tag formation than the Enforce system. All cements presented the same pattern of bubbles inside the cements. The RelyX Luting presented a greater amount of cracks inside the cement in comparison with the other cements in the coronal third, while no difference was observed between RelyX Unicem and Enforce. The RelyX Luting showed the lowest quantity of cement penetration into the post.Conclusions: In general, the quality of bonding interfaces of fiber posts luted to root canals was affected by both location and type of cement.

Highlights

  • W hen a significant horizontal loss of dental tissue occurs at the coronal level and a small ferrule can be created in the residual tooth structure, a post-and-core build up is needed with the purpose of achieving the most reliable retention for the prosthetic crown [1]

  • Adhesion of the cement to the canal walls and post surface is a decisive factor for post retention; there is no consensus in the literature about the superiority of one cement compared with the others, since the outcomes of bond strength studies are conflicting [3]

  • This controversy occurs due to unfavorable conditions that are inherent within the root canals, such as: different characteristics of the endodonticallytreated dentin, technical demand caused by restricted access to the bonding substrate and unfavorable cavity geometry to dissipate polymerization shrinkage stress [4,5]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

W hen a significant horizontal loss of dental tissue occurs at the coronal level and a small ferrule can be created in the residual tooth structure, a post-and-core build up is needed with the purpose of achieving the most reliable retention for the prosthetic crown [1]. Adhesion of the cement to the canal walls and post surface is a decisive factor for post retention; there is no consensus in the literature about the superiority of one cement compared with the others, since the outcomes of bond strength studies are conflicting [3]. This controversy occurs due to unfavorable conditions that are inherent within the root canals, such as: different characteristics of the endodonticallytreated dentin, technical demand caused by restricted access to the bonding substrate and unfavorable cavity geometry to dissipate polymerization shrinkage stress [4,5]. The null hypothesis was that morphological characteristics are not affected by the type of cement when fiber posts are bonded into the root canals

Endodontic Procedures
Results
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call