Abstract

This study of the behavior of women and men in public office focuses on the more procedural aspects of legislative life, on the policy process rather than policy inputs and outputs. At issue is whether female officeholders are changing the legislative process by employing alternative methods for obtaining their policy goals. Using data collected in 1990 from in-depth interviews with Arizona and California state legislators, I compare female and male legislators' self-reported strategies for getting bills passed, their descriptions of the bases of their own power and influence, and their orientations toward hard-ball politics. I find that these men and women were equally likely to endorse feminine or feminist leadership styles and concepts of power that stress the value of compromise, consensus-building, equality, and honesty. In addition, they were equally critical of and reluctant to participate in stereotypically masculine behavior involving hierarchically based manipulation and coercion of others. Th...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.