Abstract
This article examines an under-explored reason to have contract law: conflict minimization. An important function of contract law, the article contends, is to diminish the wasted time, effort, and resources spent on disputes over economic exchange, and to reduce the incidence of harm resulting from these disputes. Minimizing conflict typically serves the parties’ own interests, and it also serves the public interest in social peace. These insights have implications not just for contract law as a whole but also for its doctrinal details. The article thus discusses how several doctrines of substantive contract law help to minimize conflict, without claiming that currently prevailing contract law regimes are perfectly adapted to this aim. Finally, it defends the normative claim that conflict minimization should be considered one of contract law’s goals.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
