Abstract
Maxime Cohen, Samuel Dahan, and Colin Rule explore how data science research sheds new light on dispute resolution, whether it be for a customer, insurance, trademark, or employment dispute. They argue that data-driven models must be trained using both legal cases and negotiation data. They also review the current limitations of data science in the legal field, where outcomes are not always predictable.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.