Conflict Analysis for Management Policies

Abstract

Policies are a means of influencing management behaviour within a distributed system, without coding the behaviour into the managers. Authorisation policies specify what activities a manager is permitted or forbidden to do to a set of target objects and obligation policies specify what activities a manager must or must not do to a set of target objects. Conflicts can arise in the set of policies. For example an obligation policy may define an activity which is forbidden by a negative authorisation policy; there may be two authorisation policies which permit and forbid an activity or two policies permitting the same manager to sign cheques and approve payments may conflict with an external principle of separation of duties. This paper reviews the policy conflicts which may arise in a large-scale distributed system and describes a conflict analysis tool which forms part of a Role Based Management framework. Management policies are specified with regard to domains of objects and conflicts potentially arise when there are overlaps between domains. It is not desirable or possible to prevent overlaps and they do not always result in conflicts. We discuss the various techniques which can be used to determine which conflicts are important and so should be indicated to the user and which potential conflicts should be ignored because of precedence relationships between the policies. This reduces the set of potential conflicts that a user would have to resolve and avoids undesired changes of the policy specification or domain membership.