Abstract

In legal science, the topic of digital rights has become more relevant than ever. This can be explained by the adoption of new laws regulating their turnover, as well as the significant difference between regulation in Russia and regulation in similar foreign legal institutions. At the same time, in domestic legal science, insufficient attention is given to issues of private international law in this area, although any civil turnover in the digital environment is cross-border and consists of foreign elements. In this regard, the author investigated the existing conflict of laws rules and their correlation with new legal relations arising from the circulation of digital rights. Within the framework of the paper, the author singles out two types of digital rights existing in the law of the Russian Federation and considers some issues of law applicable to legal relations arising in connection with their circulation. In particular, connecting factors typical for digital utility rights and digital financial assets are considered separately. For comparison, examples of applicable law used in foreign countries are given. In addition, the author shares his reasoning about the consequences of too "dense" tying the circulation of digital rights to the Russian legal order.

Highlights

  • Тема цифровизации становится всё более актуальной во многих сферах науки, включая юриспруденцию

  • The topic of digital rights has become more relevant than ever. This can be explained by the adoption of new laws regulating their turnover, as well as the significant difference between regulation in Russia and regulation in similar foreign legal institutions

  • In domestic legal science, insufficient attention is given to issues of private international law in this area, any civil turnover in the digital

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Тема цифровизации становится всё более актуальной во многих сферах науки, включая юриспруденцию. Обычно при изучении правового регулирования цифровых прав также обсуждают цифровую валюту (в зарубежных странах известна как криптовалюта), которая определена в Законе о ЦФА. Поэтому можно было бы предложить относиться к ЦФА как к бездокументарным ценным бумагам и применять в качестве критерия для поиска применимого права право места ведения реестра владельцев цифровых финансовых активов.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.