Abstract
It was shown by Bishop that if Thurston’s K = 2 conjecture holds for some planar domain, then Brennan’s conjecture holds for the Riemann map of that domain as well. In this paper we show numerically that the original counterexample to Thurston’s K = 2 conjecture given by Epstein, Marden and Marković is not a counterexample to Brennan’s conjecture.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
