Abstract

Our objectives were to describe the confirmed bacteriological diagnosis of mastitis pathogens cultured from cases of non-severe clinical mastitis (CM) identified as Gram-positive (GP) using on-farm culture and to compare differences in bacteriological cure (BC) based on antimicrobial (AM) therapy. Cows that developed non-severe CM in a single quarter were enrolled in a randomized clinical trial based on microbial growth on GP selective agars. Cows were randomly assigned to receive a once-daily intramammary treatment: 3d hetacillin (n = 69), 3d ceftiofur (n = 69), 8d ceftiofur (n = 70) or to a non-treated group (n = 32). Etiologies were confirmed with MALDI-TOF using frozen duplicate milk samples. The crude proportion of BC was determined using milk samples collected at 14, 21 and 28 d after enrollment for cases caused by Streptococci, non-aureus staphylococci (NAS), Strep-like organisms (consisting of Enterococcus and Lactococcus.; SLO) and Staph. aureus. Multivariable models were used to determine the effect of AM treatment on BC cure at d 21 for a subset of cases that had complete data for all covariates (n = 88). Growth on GP agar resulted in enrollment of 240 cases with confirmed etiologies distributed as Strep. spp (21.7%; n = 52), Lact. spp (19.2%; n = 46), NAS (16.3%; n = 39), Staph aureus (6.3%; n = 16), Entero spp (5.0%; n = 12) and others (10%; n = 24). Thirty-five (14.5%) duplicate milk samples collected from enrolled cows had no significant growth in the lab while 16 (6.7%) were contaminated. Among sampling dates, combined crude BC for cases caused by target pathogens ranged from 68 to 71%. Crude BC ranged from 58 to 73% for the small group of non-treated cases (n = 12) and 69–71% for the combined group of cases that received IMM AM (n = 113). Among all groups and all follow-up dates, crude BC was least for cases caused by Staph. aureus (ranging from 33 to 43%), followed by cases caused by SLO (58–67%), NAS (79–80%) and Strep. spp. (81–91%). The proportion of BC at 21d (LSM ± SE) did not vary between all cases that received AM (0.77 ± 0.06) and cases in the non-treated group (0.73 ± 0.16). The odds of BC at 21d was about 5x greater for cases that occurred in primiparous as compared with multiparous cows and decreased 1.3-fold for each 1 log unit increase in SCC before the case. While this study does not have sufficient power to detect small differences in BC among pathogen groups or treatments, our results demonstrate that CM is caused by a wide diversity of GP bacteria with varying ranges of BC. These results provide justification for inclusion of negative control groups in future studies and confirm that important characteristics such as parity and history of subclinical mastitis influence the probability of BC.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call