Abstract

The Depression Anxiety and Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21) involves a simple structure first-order three-factor oblique model, with factors for depression, anxiety, and stress. Recently, concerns have been raised over the value of using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for studying the factor structure of scales in general. However, such concerns can be circumvented using exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM). Consequently, the present study used CFA and ESEM with target rotation to examine the factor structure of the DASS-21 among an adult community. It compared first-order CFA, ESEM with target rotation, bi-factor CFA (BCFA), and bi-factor BESEM with target rotation models with group/specific factors for depression, anxiety, and stress. A total of 738 adults (males = 374, and females = 364; M = 25.29 years; SD = 7.61 years) completed the DASS-21. While all models examined showed good global fit values, one or more of the group/specific factors in the BCFA, ESEM with target rotation and BESEM with target rotation models were poorly defined. As the first-order CFA model was most parsimonious, with well-defined factors that were also supported in terms of their reliabilities and validities, this model was selected as the preferred DASS-21 model. The implications of the findings for use and revision of the DASS-21 are discussed.

Highlights

  • confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) 3-F model differed from the exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) 3-F (Δdf = 36; ΔWLSMVχ2 = 152.04, p < .001), bifactor CFA (BCFA) 3-s-F (Δdf = 186; ΔWLSMVχ2 = 80.31, p < .001), and bi-factor ESEM (BESEM) 3-s-F (Δdf = 186; ΔWLSMVχ2 = 218.82, p < .001) models

  • The BCFA 3-s-F model differed from the ESEM 3-F (Δdf = 18; ΔWLSMVχ2 = 84.32, p < .001) and BESEM 3-s-F (Δdf = 36; ΔWLSMVχ2 = 152.30, p < .001) model

  • The ESEM 3-F model differed significantly from the BESEM 3-s-F (Δdf = 18; ΔWLSMVχ2 = 74.11, p < .001) model. This means that the fit values for all models differed significantly from each other, with the BESEM 3-s-F model showing the best fit, followed in sequence by ESEM 3-F, BCFA 3-s-F, and ESEM 3-F models

Read more

Summary

Aims of the present study

Given the aforementioned limitations and omissions, the major aim of the present study was to examine the structure of the DASS-21 items among adults from the general community using the BESEM with target rotation approach. The three factors in all models were depression, anxiety, and stress. These models were described earlier (see Fig 1). For all four models tested, model-based reliabilities and support for the external validities of the different factors in them were examined. Most support for the BESEM with three specific factors with target rotation model in terms of global fit was expected, but it was speculated that one or more of its specific factors may not be well defined

Participants
Background variables Employed Highest Educational Level
Procedure
Results
18 Felt rather touchy
Discussion
Limitations and conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call