Abstract

IntroductionAdequate cardiorespiratory fitness is of utmost importance during spaceflight and should be assessable via moderate work rate intensities, e.g., using kinetics parameters. The combination of restricted sleep, and defined physical exercise during a 45-day simulated space mission is expected to slow heart rate (HR) kinetics without changes in oxygen uptake ({dot{text{V}}text{O}}_{{2}}) kinetics.MethodsOverall, 14 crew members (9 males, 5 females, 37 ± 7 yrs, 23.4 ± 3.5 kg m−2) simulated a 45-d-mission to an asteroid. During the mission, the sleep schedule included 5 nights of 5 h and 2 nights of 8 h sleep. The crew members were tested on a cycle ergometer, using pseudo-random binary sequences, changing between 30 and 80 W on day 8 before (MD-8), day 22 (MD22) and 42 (MD42) after the beginning and day 4 (MD + 4) following the end of the mission. Kinetics information was assessed using the maxima of cross-correlation functions (CCFmax). Higher CCFmax indicates faster responses.ResultsCCFmax(HR) was significantly (p = 0.008) slower at MD-8 (0.30 ± 0.06) compared with MD22 (0.36 ± 0.06), MD42 (0.38 ± 0.06) and MD + 4 (0.35 ± 0.06). Mean HR values during the different work rate steps were higher at MD-8 and MD + 4 compared to MD22 and MD42 (p < 0.001).DiscussionThe physical training during the mission accelerated HR kinetics, but had no impact on mean HR values post mission. Thus, HR kinetics seem to be sensitive to changes in cardiorespiratory fitness and may be a valuable parameter to monitor fitness. Kinetics and capacities adapt independently in response to confinement in combination with defined physical activity and sleep.

Highlights

  • Adequate cardiorespiratory fitness is of utmost importance during spaceflight and should be assessable via moderate work rate intensities, e.g., using kinetics parameters

  • Independent of the steps during the work rate (WR) protocol, V O2pulm was significantly higher at MD-8 compared with MD22 (p = 0.009) and MD42 (p = 0.003)

  • MBP values were significantly higher at MD-8 in comparison with MD22 (p = 0.028) and MD42

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Adequate cardiorespiratory fitness is of utmost importance during spaceflight and should be assessable via moderate work rate intensities, e.g., using kinetics parameters. Peak and/or maximal exercise performance [e.g., peak oxygen uptake capacity ( V O2peak ); maximal oxygen uptake ( V O2max )] (Hawkins et al 2007; Poole and Jones 2017) as well as ventilatory thresholds (VTs) (Poole and Jones 2017) are usually assessed applying cardiopulmonary exercise tests and provide a comprehensive description of individual aerobic capacity and physical fitness Another possibility to describe the functionality of the cardiorespiratory system is to analyze the response times (kinetics) of the different physiological parameters, e.g. heart rate (HR) and oxygen uptake ( V O2 ) after changes in work rate (WR). Since the assessment does not require high motivation or close medical surveillance, as would be the case for the assessment of V O2peak (Myers et al 2014), the analysis of cardiorespiratory kinetics might be a valuable approach to monitor fitness during long duration missions to space, while supervision by medical staff is not directly available

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call