Abstract

In tension lap splices, the benefit provided to the lap by stirrups placed to intercept longitudinal cracking due to bond splitting action is recognized by the American Concrete Institute code (ACI 318-89) and the design recommendations of ACI Committee 408, on which the American code provisions are partially based. However, a limit exists on the benefit that can be derived from this confinement. In Canada, Canadian Standards Association Standard CAN3 A23.3 M-84 does not directly recognize the confinement benefit provided by stirrups placed along a lap splice. The current study shows that the ACI limit of 1 bar diameter of equivalent concrete cover provided by the transverse reinforcement confinement is too restrictive under static loading. When the concrete cover is small, much larger transverse reinforcement confinement, up to 2-2.5 bar diameters of equivalent concrete cover, can be utilized, in lieu of requiring very long lap lengths. The tests also show that total confinement (actual concrete confinement plus equivalent concrete confinement provided by stirrups) is effective beyond the current limit of 3 main bar diameters, when stirrups are provided. Good performance was found with confinements of 4-4.5 bar diameters, and correspondingly shorter lap splice lengths. Key words: concrete, reinforcement, lap splices, beams, confinement, stirrups, tension, static loading.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call