Confined combustion of polymeric solid materials in microgravity

Abstract

Microgravity experiments are performed to study the effects of confinement on the burning behavior of polymeric solid materials. Flat, 100 × 22 × 1 mm PMMA samples are burned in concurrent air flow in a small flow duct aboard the International Space Station. Three different burning scenarios are examined, double-sided, single-sided, and parallel samples. In the first two scenarios, single samples are burned on both sides and on one side, respectively. Flat baffles are placed parallel to the sample to confine the available space for combustion. The distance between the baffle and the sample (H) is varied in different tests. In each test, imposed flow is reduced in steps and steady flame spread is achieved at each flow speed until the flame quenches. The results show that at the same confined condition, steady state flame length and spread rate are proportional to flow speed over the range tested. When confinement increases (or H decreases), the flame spread rate and flame length increase first and then decrease. In addition, the quenching flow speed decreases and then increases with decreasing H. These results suggest that the confinement can increase or decrease solid fuel flammability depending on conditions. In the third burning scenario, two PMMA samples are placed parallel to each other separated by a distance H. Twin flames are observed and combustion is confined between the two samples. Among the three tested burning scenarios, twin flames have the largest flame length and burning rate at the same confinement level (H). This is because the thermal interaction between the twin flames enhances the heat feedback to the solid fuel and reduces the relative heat loss to the surrounding flow duct. Comparing single- and double-sided flames with the same baffle-sample distance, the spread rate of a single-sided flame is slightly less than half of that of a double-sided flame. This is due to the halved pyrolysis area exposed to the flame and heat loss on the back side of the sample. Optimal transport of oxygen to the flames also plays a role.