Abstract
Two methods of constructing confidence intervals for variance components in gauge capability studies are presented in this article. Comparisons are made between the restricted maximum likelihood (REML) method and the modified large sample (MLS) method for constructing confidence intervals for components of repeatability, reproducibility, and total (gauge) variability. The examples considered involve a factorial design and a nonstandard nested design. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
