Abstract

We focus on the construction of confidence intervals for the ratios of medians of two independent, log-normal distributions based on the normal approximation (NA) approach, the method of variance estimate recovery (MOVER), and the generalized confidence interval (GCI) approach. We also compare the performance of the three confidence intervals in terms of the coverage probabilities, and average lengths, using Monte Carlo simulations. The results show that the GCI confidence interval is generally preferred in terms of coverage probabilities; however, the average length for the GCI is always wider than for other approaches. The NA and MOVER approaches could be recommended on the basis of the specific values of and/or sample sizes. The confidence intervals are illustrated using real data examples.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call