Abstract
AbstractAn alteration to Woodward's methods is recommended for deriving a 1 — α confidence interval for microbial density using serial dilutions with most‐probable‐number (MPN) estimates. Outcomes of the serial dilution test are ordered by their MPNs. A lower limit for the confidence interval corresponding to an outcome y is the density for which y and all higher ordered outcomes have total probability α/2. An upper limit is derived in the analogous way. An alteration increases the lowest lower limits and decreases the highest upper limits. For comparison, a method that is optimal in the sense of null hypothesis rejection is described. This method ranks outcomes dependent upon the microbial density in question, using proportional first derivatives of the probabilities. These and currently used methods are compared. The recommended method is shown to be more desirable in certain respects, although resulting in slightly wider confidence intervals than De Man's (1983) method.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.