Abstract
This brief response unpacks and contextualizes the alleged tragedy of a “lack of an effective countervailing voice that could respond to the instrumentalization of Canada's international history for reactionary ends.” Rather than advocating a single voice, it suggests the use of multiple perspectives. For international history to flourish in Canada, it explains, we must welcome all sorts of histories, from the bottom and from the top, written for academic and popular audiences and from micro- and macro-level perspectives. A failure to work together, and thereby validate one another's interests and passions, can only lead to further instrumentalization, and nothing would be more tragic than that.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
