Abstract
Being a small state, an interest in upholding international rule of law has long shaped Singapore’s contributions to international peacekeeping. While this remains the overarching rationale, Singapore’s approach is undergoing subtle yet significant changes, from its mission profiles, widening perceptions of security interests, capabilities contributed, to deepening cooperation with foreign partners. This paper analyses these policy developments within a broader historical and theoretical context, drawing on recent literature about small states and peacekeeping. The first section examines how Singapore’s self-conscious sense of being a small state underpins its participation in peace missions and the constraints it faces. From its initial milieu goals of supporting international law, the tiny city-state has branched out to join US-led stability operations that are presented as serving its direct security interests in a globalised world. The second section analyses how Singapore compensates for its resource limitations by developing comprehensive training packages with other nations. In the field, Singaporean forces are also increasingly embedded with more experienced countries and contribute higher-end niche capabilities. The final section presents some challenges, including doctrinal questions, recent attempts at institutional streamlining, and structural reform of Singapore’s armed forces that remain essentially trained for territorial defence.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.