Abstract
Participatory photographic methods aim to redress researcher bias and privilege by involving non-researchers in subject inquiry. When considering the commitment of researchers and the generosity of participants, approaches can be difficult to evaluate and replicate. Moreover, expectations of rigour can create additional pressures, particularly when researchers face increased scrutiny over budget usage, eco-consciousness, stricter ethics guidelines, time-management, and administrative requirements. While photographers considering participatory methods are advised to think carefully about the suitability, less is made of the value of failure or the messiness of photographic practice. This paper is a critical reflection on participatory components of practice-led research in Japan over ten years. Specifically, it problematizes two photographic research projects where participation resulted in methodological shifts in the author’s creative practice. Recognizing the tension between learning from everyday camera users and emancipating them from photography’s various programs, it considers rendering visible uncertainties and time poverty – though not attractive – for shared inquiries.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Membrana – Journal of Photography, Theory and Visual Culture
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
