Abstract
AbstractIn the search for economical cocoa butter alternatives, palm and lauric oils have emerged as important source oils in the development of hard butters. Based on the method presented for categorizing hard butters, the lauric oils, primarily palm kernel and coconut, can be modified by interesterification and hydrogenated to yield lauric cocoa butter substitutes (CBS) which are both good eating and inexpensive. Fractionation, although adding to the cost of production, can provide lauric hard butter with eating qualities virtually identical to cocoa butter. Unfortunately, one factor identified with the lauric oils is their very low tolerance for cocoa butter.Palm oil, on the other hand, has been identified as a valuable component in all types of cocoa butter alternatives. It is a source of symmetrical triglycerides vital in the formulation of a cocoa butter equivalent (CBE). It can be hydrogenated or hydrogenated and fractionated to yield hard butters with a limited degree of compatibility with cocoa butter, allowing some chocolate liquor to be included in a coating for flavor enhancement. Palm oil is used with lauric oils as a minor component in interesterified lauric hard butters, as well as functioning as a crystal promoter in coatings formulated with a fractionated lauric CBS. While palm oil's importance and flexibility have been duly noted, some important concerns remain from a market perspective. The fact that the CBE fats are very expensive suggests they offer limited cost savings compared to cocoa butter. The potential for CBE products is still questionable in those countries where chocolate labeling standards preclude the use of vegetable fats other than cocoa butter. The nonlauric CBS products, while cheaper than the CBE types and able to tolerate limited levels of cocoa butter, do not exhibit the level of eating quality characteristics present in the lauric hard butters.Some challenges remain for today's oil chemists. An economical nonlauric CBS, made predominantly from palm oil, possessing the eating quality of a fractionated lauric CBS and exhibiting good compatibility with cocoa butter would be met with considerable interest by the chocolate and confectionery industries. As for the lauric oils, it would seem reasonable to assume that greater cocoa butter compatibility, if attainable, could enhance their potential for gaining even greater acceptance by confectionery manufacturers currently using pure chocolate. As for the CBE products, the major issue is cost. If the cost of a CBE could be reduced to a level which would allow a CBE to compete with the nonlauric and lauric cocoa butter substitutes, a major advancement in the evolution of cocoa butter alternative fats will have been achieved.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.