Abstract
Is there evidence that listeners are "confused" about sound-source location when sound sources lie on cones-of-confusion? Two experiments determined whether response times and confidence ratings, as possible indices of "confusion," varied as a function of the frequency of occurrence of cones-of-confusion errors in azimuthal sound-source localization tasks. The results suggest that for sound-source localization judgments on an azimuth plane, there is little evidence that response times or confidence ratings vary with the frequency of occurrence of cones-of-confusion errors, consistent with the assumption that listeners are not "confused" in making sound-source location judgments when sound sources are on an azimuthal cone-of-confusion.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
