Abstract

The arrangement of the condotel agreement in Law Number 20 of 2011 concerning Flats is not yet clear, as shown by the absence of a dictum governing hotel condos. Hotels, while Condominiums or flats are only related to the ownership of flats that are more in the context of private settlements, the absence of a clear Condotel arrangement makes Condotel owners often lose money. The purpose of this study is to analyze the current Condominium Hotel (CONDOTEL) arrangement in Indonesia and analyze the weaknesses of the current Condominium Hotel (CONDOTEL) arrangement in Indonesia; the research paradigm in this dissertation is constructivism with non-doctrinal research methods with a sociological juridical approach. The results of existing research state that the implementation of hotel condominium agreements so far does not have a juridical footing in Indonesia, this has resulted in many developers and builders who often seek big profits without heeding the principles of good ethics in buying and selling agreements and managing hotel condominiums. The weakness in the hotel condominium agreement policy is the weakness of the legislation in the form of not regulating the contents of the hotel condominium agreement and the position of the hotel condominium in Law Number 20 of 2011, the weakness of law enforcement in the form of no supervision related to the sale and purchase agreement and hotel condominium management. , and the habitual factor of hotel condominium development and construction actors who seek profit through sale and purchase agreements and hotel condominium management by excluding consumers or hotel condominium owners.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call