Abstract
Rule-based reservoir modeling methods integrate geological depositional process concepts to generate reservoir models that capture realistic geologic features for improved subsurface predictions and uncertainty models to support development decision making. However, the robust and direct conditioning of these models to subsurface data, such as well logs, core descriptions, and seismic inversions and interpretations, remains as an obstacle for the broad application as a standard subsurface modeling technology. We implement a machine learning-based method for fast and flexible data conditioning of rule-based models. This study builds on a rule-based modeling method for deep-water lobe reservoirs. The model has three geological inputs: (1) the depositional element geometry, (2) the compositional exponent for element stacking pattern, and (3) the distribution of petrophysical properties with hierarchical trends conformable to the surfaces. A deep learning-based workflow is proposed for robust and non-iterative data conditioning. First, a generative adversarial network learns salient geometric features from the ensemble of the training rule-based models. Then, a new rule-based model is generated and a mask is applied to remove the model near local data along the well trajectories. Last, semantic image inpainting restores the mask with the optimum generative adversarial network realization that is consistent with both local data and the surrounding model. For the deep-water lobe example, the generative adversarial network learns the primary geological spatial features to generate reservoir realizations that reproduce hierarchical trend as well as the surface geometries and stacking pattern. Moreover, the trained generative adversarial network explores the latent reservoir manifold and identifies the ensemble of models to represent an uncertainty model. Semantic image inpainting determines the optimum replacement for the near-data mask that is consistent with the local data and the rest of the model. This work results in subsurface models that accurately reproduce reservoir heterogeneity, continuity, and spatial distribution of petrophysical parameters while honoring the local well data constraints.
Highlights
Geological heterogeneity characterization is one of the key processes to understand subsurface rock and fluid systems, essential in the fields of groundwater management such as CO2 sequestration, water, oil and gas production, mineral mining, and foundation and excavation design
Complex subsurface heterogeneity is defined as a non-linear, non-Gaussian, multivariate, and multiscale spatial property distribution of rock and fluid features caused by convoluted geological deposition, preservation, and in-situ alteration processes (Mariethoz and Caers, 2014; Pyrcz and Deutsch, 2014)
The lobe geometry and stacking pattern are suspected of having a significant impact on subsurface flow due to the unique superposition of low permeability lobe margin and high permeability inner lobe in the resulting unique stacking pattern (Mutti and Normark, 1987)
Summary
Geological heterogeneity characterization is one of the key processes to understand subsurface rock and fluid systems, essential in the fields of groundwater management such as CO2 sequestration, water, oil and gas production, mineral mining, and foundation and excavation design. Complex subsurface heterogeneity is defined as a non-linear, non-Gaussian, multivariate, and multiscale spatial property distribution of rock and fluid features caused by convoluted geological deposition, preservation, and in-situ alteration processes (Mariethoz and Caers, 2014; Pyrcz and Deutsch, 2014). Standard geostatistical approaches are a limited set of stationary spatial continuity statistics such as variogram model parameters, training images conditional probabilities, or geometric object parameter distributions. As such, they are limited in their ability to characterize complicated subsurface heterogeneity (Pyrcz and Deutsch, 2014). Conventional geostatistical workflows often fail to integrate information such as geological concepts, depositional settings, or structures of stacking elements (Michael et al, 2010; Pyrcz et al, 2005; Pyrcz and Deutsch, 2014)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.