Abstract
The generality of the laws of learning has been questioned on the basis of the results of conditioned taste aversion (CTA) experiments. The results of CTA experiments and of traditional learning (TL) experiments are compared in order to evaluate whether CTA and TL indeed follow different rules. It is shown that (a) most of the observed differences between CTA and TL experiments may simply reflect peculiarities of the CSs and USs used in CTA, (b) that there are conflicting phenomena in both CTA and TL experiments which require further analysis, and (c) that the majority of learning phenomena seen in CTA experiments also occur in TL experiments. It is therefore suggested that the laws that hold for TL also apply to CTA.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.