Abstract

International drug regulators use conditional drug approval mechanisms to facilitate faster patient access to drugs based on a lower evidentiary standard typically required of drug approvals. Faster and earlier access is justified by limiting eligibility to drugs intended for serious and life-threatening diseases and by requiring post-market evidence collection to confirm clinical benefit. One such mechanism in Canada, the Notice of Compliance with Conditions (NOC/c) policy, was introduced in 1998. Today, most of the drugs approved under the NOC/c policy are for oncology indications. We analyze oncology drugs approvals under the NOC/c policy to inform discussions of two tradeoffs applied to conditional drug approvals, eligibility criteria and post-market evidence. Our analysis informs recommendations for Canada's proposed regulatory reforms approach to conditional approvals pathways. Our analysis demonstrates that under the current policy, eligibility criteria are insufficiently defined, resulting in their inconsistent application by Health Canada. Regulatory responsiveness to post-market evidence from post-market clinical trial and foreign jurisdiction regulatory decisions is slow and insufficient. In the absence of sufficient regulatory responsiveness, physicians and patients must make clinical decisions without the benefit of the best available evidence. Together, our analysis of the two core tradeoffs in Canada's conditional drug approval provides insight to inform the further development of Canada's proposed agile regulatory approach to drugs and devices that will expand the use of terms and conditions.

Highlights

  • Drug regulators have introduced conditional drug approval pathways to accelerate patient access to promising therapies since the 1990s

  • Conditional approval pathways have represented a significant path to market for new oncology drugs and indications over the last decade

  • Our analysis revealed that eligibility criteria are not clearly defined and inconsistently applied under the NOC/c policy, undermining the justification of earlier market access based on less mature evidence

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Drug regulators have introduced conditional drug approval pathways to accelerate patient access to promising therapies since the 1990s. Prior to durvalumab’s conditional approval in November 2017, atezolizumab was approved as second line therapy for urothelial carcinoma under the NOC/c policy in April 2017 The approval of another therapy for the same indication should have required that durvalumab meet the alternative threshold of significant improvement over existing therapies, but instead, the eligibility criterion defined a time point that based the decision on the lack of available therapy at the time of submission. Three drugs currently approved in Canada under the NOC/c policy have either been voluntarily withdrawn or recommended for withdrawal in the US by the FDA Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC), because post-market clinical trials failed to confirm benefit in the indication.

Summary
LIMITATIONS
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call