Abstract

Investigating the expression of trade-offs between key life-history functions is central to our understanding of how these functions evolved and are maintained. However, detecting trade-offs can be challenging due to variation in resource availability, which masks trade-offs at the population level. Here, we investigated in the European earwig Forficula auricularia whether (1) weapon size trades off with three key immune parameters – hemocyte concentration, phenoloxidase and prophenoloxidase activity - and whether (2) expression and strength of these trade-offs depend on male body condition (body size) and/or change after an immune challenge. Our results partially confirmed condition dependent trade-offs between weapon size and immunity in male earwigs. Specifically, we found that after an immune challenge, weapon size trades off with hemocyte concentrations in low-condition, but not in good-condition males. Contrastingly, weapon size was independent of pre-challenge hemocyte concentration. We also found no trade-off between weapon size and phenoloxidase activity, independent of body condition and immune challenge. Overall, our study reveals that trade-offs with sexual traits may weaken or disappear in good-condition individuals. Given the importance of weapon size for male reproductive success, our results highlight how low-condition individuals may employ alternative life-history investment strategies to cope with resource limitation.

Highlights

  • The reversal or removal of trade-offs has been suggested for male sexual traits as part of the handicap principle[19], which aims to explain how male sexual traits evolved and more importantly, why they - in theory - must be honest, i.e. reflect the condition of the bearer

  • Hemocyte concentration traded off with forceps length in the smaller males, whereas hemocyte concentration increased together with forceps length in the largest males (Fig. 2a). Independent of this effect, post-challenge hemocyte concentration was overall higher in LPS-pricked than in control-pricked males (P = 0.015, Table 1 and Fig. 2b) and the post-challenge and basal levels of hemocyte concentrations were positively correlated in the smaller males only

  • We investigated whether the forceps size of field-sampled earwig males traded off with their immunocompetence and whether the expression and direction of this trade-off depended on male body size

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The reversal or removal of trade-offs has been suggested for male sexual traits as part of the handicap principle[19], which aims to explain how male sexual traits evolved and more importantly, why they - in theory - must be honest, i.e. reflect the condition of the bearer. In a refined model based on the handicap principle, Grafen proposed in 199020 that marginal costs of advertising sexual traits are higher for individuals in poor condition This suggests that trade-offs involving sexual traits should be less taxing on other life-history traits in high compared to low-condition males and result in an overall positive growth allometry in high condition males only (relative scaling of body parts)[21]. Condition dependency of sexually-selected weapons or ornaments in males has been established in a number of species, such as horn length in the isopod Deto echinata[24], eye span in the stalk-eyed fly Diasemopsis aethiopica[25], or weapon size in the cactus bug Narnia femorata[26] To what degree this condition dependency of sexually-selected traits affects any trade-offs with other, non-sexual traits remains largely unknown. We investigated whether trade-offs between sexual (forceps length) and life-history (immunity) traits are condition-dependent in males of the European earwig Forficula auricularia. If the condition of a male determines the presence and direction of an investment trade-off between weapon size and immunocompetence in the direction predicted by Grafen[20], we expected to detect a trade-off between forceps length and the level of basal immunity and/or immune response in the smallest (i.e. low quality) but not the largest (i.e. high quality) males

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.