Abstract

We assessed prevalence of concurrently wasted and stunted (WaSt) and explored the overlaps between wasted, stunted, underweight and low mid‐upper arm circumference (MUAC) among children aged 6–59 months in Karamoja, Uganda. We also determined optimal weight‐for‐age (WAZ) and MUAC thresholds for detecting WaSt. We conducted secondary data analysis with 2015–2018 Food Security and Nutrition Assessment (FSNA) cross‐sectional survey datasets from Karamoja. Wasting, stunting and underweight were defined as <−2.0 z‐scores using WHO growth standards. Low MUAC was defined as <12.5 cm. We defined WaSt as concurrent wasting and stunting. Prevalence of WaSt was 4.96% (95% CI [4.64, 5.29]). WaSt was more prevalent in lean than harvest season (5.21% vs. 4.53%; p = .018). About half (53.92%) of WaSt children had low MUAC, and all were underweight. Younger children aged <36 months had more WaSt, particularly males. Males with WaSt had higher median MUAC than females (12.50 vs. 12.10 cm; p < .001). A WAZ <−2.60 threshold detected WaSt with excellent sensitivity (99.02%) and high specificity (90.71%). MUAC threshold <13.20 cm had good sensitivity (81.58%) and moderate specificity (76.15%) to detect WaSt. WaSt prevalence of 5% is a public health concern, given its high mortality risk. All children with WaSt were underweight and half had low MUAC. WAZ and MUAC could be useful tools for detecting WaSt. Prevalence monitoring and prospective studies on WAZ and MUAC cut‐offs for WaSt detection are recommended. Future consideration to integrate WAZ into therapeutic feeding programmes is recommended to detect and treat WaSt children.

Highlights

  • MUACt hr e s h ol d < 1 3. 2 0 cmhadgoodsen siti vit y ( 8 1. 5 8 %) andmod er at e s p e cifi cit y ( 7 6. 1 5 %) t o d et e ct W a St

  • St u nt e d c hil dr enhave 1. 5-f ol d ri skandwa st e d c hil dr enhave 2. 3-f ol d ri skcomp ar e d wit h c hil dr e n wit h o ut d efi cit s ( McDon al d et al, 2 0 1 3; M y att et al, 2 0 1 8; O d ei Obeng- Amoako et al, 2 0 2 0)

  • M at er n C hil d N utr . 2 0 2 0; e 1 3 0 0 0. htt p s: / / d oi. or g / 1 0. 1 1 1 1 /

Read more

Summary

Attri b ut e C hil dr e n Sex

8. 0 3 1 7. 3 5 1 5. 7 1 a I Q R, i nt er q u artil erange. C o m mitt e e. 9]), thetwoshadedp orti o n s of theVenn di a gr amshowthei nt er s e cti o n of s et s of c hil dr e n wit h w a sti ngand st u nti n g ( 1, 6 3 4 / 3 2, 9 6 2). TheCLESshoweda sli g htl y s u p eri orit y W H Z ( w a st e d- o nl y) > W H Z ( W a St), alt houghthe diff er encewasn ot st ati sti c all y si g nifi c a nt. Theme di anHAZin st u nt e d- o nl y c hil dr encomp ar e d wit h W a St c hil dr enwas si g nific a ntl y diff er e nt

All W a St
Findings
Wei g ht
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.