Abstract
The present investigation compared the Cognitive Levels Test (CLT) with the Woodcock Reading Mastery Test (WRMT) and Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised (WRAT-R) for 55 children and youth who were referred for remedial/special education services. A comparison of the correlations for the criterion measures for the WRMT and WRAT-R showed a consistent significant positive relationship with the CLT. A repeated measures analysis of variance that compared standard scores of the CLT with those of the WRMT and WRAT-R indicated that significant differences existed between the test scores. Implications with respect to the concurrent validity of the CLT are discussed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
