Concurrent TB and HIV therapies effectively control clinical reactivation of TB during co-infection but fail to eliminate chronic immune activation.

Abstract

The majority of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) negative individuals exposed to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) control the bacillary infection as latent TB infection (LTBI). Co-infection with HIV, however, drastically increases the risk to progression to tuberculosis (TB) disease. TB is therefore the leading cause of death in people living with HIV (PLWH) globally. Combinatorial antiretroviral therapy (cART) is the cornerstone of HIV care in humans and reduces the risk of reactivation of LTBI. However, the immune control of Mtb infection is not fully restored by cART as indicated by higher incidence of TB in PLWH despite cART. In the macaque model of co-infection, skewed pulmonary CD4+ TEM responses persist, and new TB lesions form despite cART treatment. We hypothesized that regimens that concurrently administer anti-TB therapy and cART would significantly reduce TB in co-infected macaques than cART alone, resulting in superior bacterial control, mitigation of persistent inflammation and lasting protective immunity. We studied components of TB immunity that remain impaired after cART in the lung compartment, versus those that are restored by concurrent 3 months of once weekly isoniazid and rifapentine (3HP) and cART in the rhesus macaque (RM) model of LTBI and Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV) co-infection. Concurrent administration of cART + 3HP did improve clinical and microbiological attributes of Mtb/SIV co-infection compared to cART-naïve or -untreated RMs. While RMs in the cART + 3HP group exhibited significantly lower granuloma volumes after treatment, they, however, continued to harbor caseous granulomas with increased FDG uptake. cART only partially restores the constitution of CD4 + T cells to the lung compartment in co-infected macaques. Concurrent therapy did not further enhance the frequency of reconstituted CD4+ T cells in BAL and lung of Mtb/SIV co-infected RMs compared to cART, and treated animals continued to display incomplete reconstitution to the lung. Furthermore, the reconstituted CD4+ T cells in BAL and lung of cART + 3HP treated RMs exhibited an increased frequencies of activated, exhausted and inflamed phenotype compared to LTBI RMs. cART + 3HP failed to restore the effector memory CD4+ T cell population that was significantly reduced in pulmonary compartment post SIV co-infection. Concurrent therapy was associated with the induction of Type I IFN transcriptional signatures and led to increased Mtb-specific TH1/TH17 responses correlated with protection, but decreased Mtb-specific TNFa responses, which could have a detrimental impact on long term protection. Our results suggest the mechanisms by which Mtb/HIV co-infected individuals remain at risk for progression due to subsequent infections or reactivation due of persisting defects in pulmonary T cell responses. By identifying lung-specific immune components in this model, it is possible to pinpoint the pathways that can be targeted for host-directed adjunctive therapies for TB/HIV co-infection.