Abstract

Ss learned a paired-associate list in which concrete, high imagery and abstract, low imagery nouns served as stimuli for nonsense syllable associates. The lengths of the study-recall intervals and intertrial intervals were varied. Performance improved over trials and was superior for concrete stimuli and longer study-recall intervals. A significant interaction indicated that abstract noun stimuli need longer study periods than concrete noun stimuli for discovery and utilization in learning.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.