Abstract
An 84-in. (2.14-m)-diam., reinforced concrete, dummy pipe culvert, with a 1,000-D load rating, was buried under 136 ft (41.5 m) of highway embankment. Six 40-ft (12.2-m)-long zones were subjected to the following bedding and backfill parameters: (1) pipe in trench, shaped bedding; (2) pipe in trench, unshaped, fine aggregate bedding; (3) positive projection, shaped bedding; (4) positive projection, 60° concrete bedding; (5) positive projection, pipe bedded on two 3 in. x 24 in. (7.6 cm x 61.0 cm) polystyrene planks; and (6) positive projection, line bearing on hard earth. Qualitative observations were made of progressive changes in cracking patterns, and measurements were made of pipe shape in each zone at intervals of fill height. Results indicated that placement of a pipe in a trench was of much greater importance than shaping the bedding. The 60° concrete bedding failed most dramatically. The polystyrene plank bedding showed some promise.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.