Abstract

Hart T, Whyte J, Polansky M, Millis S, Hammond FM, Sherer M, Bushnik T, Hanks R, Kreutzer J. Concordance of patient and family report of neurobehavioral symptoms at 1 year after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:204-13. Objective: To determine concordance between patient and family report of neurobehavioral symptoms and problems across 6 domains of function and 3 levels of injury severity at 1 year after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Design: Prospective longitudinal design with follow-up between 10 and 14 months postinjury. Setting: Seventeen Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems centers. Participants: A total of 267 adults with primarily moderate and severe TBI who had completed self-ratings and whose neurobehavioral symptoms had also been rated by their significant others. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Neurobehavioral Functioning Inventory[ndash ]Revised, a 70-item scale with subscales assessing frequency of symptoms in motor, somatic, memory and attention, depression, communication, and aggression domains. Results: Twenty-three items showed significant differences or trends between the self- and other ratings; 18 of these were in the direction of the injured individual reporting less frequent problems. Differences were most pronounced on the depression, aggression, and memory and attention subscales. On the latter 2 subscales, patient-family concordance was higher for those with less severe injuries. However, severity effects were not clear cut. Analyses of selected rating patterns indicating clinically significant [ldquo ]underreporting[rdquo ] of symptoms revealed that these affected the depression, aggression, and memory and attention subscales more than the motor or somatic subscales. Conclusions: At 1 year post-TBI, concordance between self- and other report of neurobehavioral symptoms was moderately high overall, but varied by symptom domain. For persons with moderate and severe TBI, reports from significant others may be needed for a full picture of the range, severity, and clinical importance of the patient's emotional, behavioral, and cognitive difficulties. [copy ] 2003 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.